Архив Војводине / Archives of Vojvodina

No. 155

ON MAY 4, 1942, POLICE ATTACHÉ HELM REPORTS TO BELGRADE POLICE COMMANDER SCHÄFER THAT SECRETARY OF STATE KVATERNIK HAD INFORMED HIM REGARDING THE ATROCITIES COMMITTED BY THE MUSLIM LEGION, THAT A PART OF THE LEGION HAD BEEN DISARMED AND THAT IT WOULD SOON BE DISBANDED.[1]

German Embassy                                                                 Zagreb, May 4, 1942

Police Attaché                                                                        Gvozd 15

Tel. 22-352

Br. Nr. 952/42

Co/PY

Security Police and Security Service[2]

Belgrade, May 8, 1942

K III  16/5[3]                      Office: III

  1. Nr. 346/172

2874/42         18/5[4]

VB for K.

III A Into the files: Atrocities[5]

For

Commander of the Security Police and Security Service

SS Lieutenant Colonel Dr. Schäfer[6]

Belgrade.

Subject:               New atrocities of Croats and Muslims in the area of Tuzla,

eastern Bosnia.

Reference to:     Letter there B. Nr. 2874/42 of 20 April 1942

As to the above issue, Secretary of State Kvaternik[7] was again instructed here to show that the Muslim Legion is not[8] adequate to carry out the tasks assigned to it by the Croatian government. Based on the repeated pointing out of the violations of the law and the atrocities of this legion, an energetic action has now been taken by the Secretary of State Kvaternik. Thus, on April 28, 1942, the commander of a Hadžiefendić unit was convicted by court-martial for undisciplined behavior in Vlasenica and shot by the Ustashas. His unit of about 160 legionnaires was disarmed. A unit of the Muslim militia in Rogatica was also disarmed, and the disarmament of a battalion stationed along the Drina, numbering about 700 people, is underway.

It is intended that the entire Muslim Legion (approximately 3,000 people) be disarmed within 3-4 weeks and that those good elements, who are willing to behave in a disciplined manner later, join the Ustashas.

Helm[9] personal signature

SS-Major, Pol.[ice] att.[aché]

[1] АВ, Ф. 562, 3.1.1.2, 504.

[2] Stamp of reception.

[3] Handwritten note.

[4] Initials, probably those of SS Major Weinmann.

[5] Handwritten notes.

[6] Emanuel Schäfer.

[7] Eugen Kvaternik.

[8] Underlined in red pencil.

[9] Hans Helm.

This – English – edition of the book is a translation of the one in the Serbian language, published in 2022 under the title Ustaška zverstva: Zbornik dokumenata (1941–1942). As far as the corpus of the Dossier from the personal fonds of Slavko Odić is concerned – and it makes the essential body of this book – the translation team worked from its Serbian version given in the said book and not from the German original.

The Serbian edition, with the documents translated from German, was printed in the Cyrillic alphabet, which necessitated some explanations provided by the Editor, Dr. Milan Koljanin, with regard to the linguistic traits, orthography and punctuation resorted to by the translators from German into Serbian (Tatjana Janićijević, Akademija Oxford) and the Editor. Naturally enough, numerous clarifications referring to the Serbian edition do not apply on the English one in most of the aspects of translation work. Hence the need to write this Note.

To begin with, the translators basically opted for the varieties of the American English rather than British English.

Personal names in the officially processed documents are most often written in what is today considered inverse order: family name/surname first, followed by one’s first/Christian name, without a comma in between.

Originally, the documents (letters, reports, statements etc.) were written (typed) in bureaucratic style and with a page layout practised by German offices, so these traits have been retained herein, and so have the obvious spelling and/or typing errors (personal names, toponyms); the latter have been corrected in the footnotes. The parts of text/sentences which are underlined or written with spaces between letters as means of emphasis correspond to the German original and its Serbian/Croat counterpart. The same applies to whole words or lines written in capital letters.

Punctuation has been kept almost completely, except when the meaning demanded comma (usually related to the rules of word order in an English sentence). Some marks, such as hyphens, dashes or slashes may impress the Reader as outdated or misplaced. Earlier typewriters did not have buttons with parentheses, and the slash was used instead of them.

Dates are written with differing uses or omissions of period (full stop), whereby month is written in three ways: fully in letters (20 January), in Arabic numerals (e.g. 20.1.) or Roman numerals (e.g. 20.I.). In rare cases, the slash can be found in dates (e.g. 12./X. 1941), but not as a regular separator between their constituents. Years are occasionaly written without the first digit, e.g. 942 instead of 1942, which is a frequent occurrence in oral communication.

Abbreviations, other than official identification means for offices, titles or codenames (VB, MA, RSHA etc.), have been translated (e.g. ’etc.’). The translators chose to retain the Croat/Serbian abbreviation for the name of the wartime ’state’, that is, ’NDH’ is standing for Nezavisna Država Hrvatska (Independent State of Croatia) instead of the less known English name (ISC). Some words were written in a shortened form for the reason of economy of expression, and the habit has been transferred to the translation, including the Editor’s intervention in the Serbian edition: Reg.[ister], Gend.[armerie], Gor[nja] Tuzla.

Footnotes in the English edition partially differ from those in the Serbian version. Some proved to be unnecessary (those that provided original names which were transliterated into the phonetical Cyrillic alphabet). New footnotes have been added by the Subeditor in order to explain/clarify the specific, locally used, words or phrases with which the Reader may not be familiar (such as slava, din, sokolski dom), or to indicate some nuances in the meaning (student, profesor). Here and there, the Reader will find notes in brackets inserted into the main body of the text by translators or the Editor where immediate understanding was needed.

Finally, it is noteworthy that the above-mentioned bureaucratic style of the presented documents mirrors the established conventions of communication in Central Europe and the Balkans of the first half of the 20th century, particularly in state and military affairs, yet also illustrates the specific ’hierarchy’ of various authorities on the occupied territories during World War Two, accentuating the relations between the German organs/institutions in power and the various offices subordinated to the administrative and military system of the Third Reich. As to the information, facts and accounts of events recorded in these documents, they are the subject of the history science and studies related thereto.

A. Č. P.